By way of Tolewyn’s da, we are treated to a selection of animal videos with voice-overs dubbed in by those cheeky lads over at the Beeb:
*gigglesnort*
LawDog
My brother Chris gets his paws on a camera phone and a gnome and promptly scripts a Christmas tale.
LawDog
I see that YouTube has taken down the TSO video I traditionally post here and replaced it with something bracketed by commercials.
Sigh.
Oh, well. The music is the important part anyway.
Happy holidays and a joyous Yule, Gentle Readers.
LawDog
OPERATION ORDER 12-05:
OFFICIAL VISIT OF LIEUTENANT GENERAL S. CLAUS
An official staff visit by LtGen Claus is expected at this base on 25 Dec. The following directives govern activities of all personnel during the visit:
(Signed)
For The Commander
Author Unknown.
Probably a little esoteric for my non-prior-service Gentle Readers, but I expect at least a bit of the humour will come through.
Happy Holidays!
LawDog
As a Gentle Reader commented, I have the best readership.
Nana had a good meal on Wednesday, with a good dessert — always her favourite part — talked with the staff and other residents, and watched a movie on the telly before going to bed.
Thursday morning, she couldn’t be woken up.
She was unresponsive for several days, allowing family to say their goodbyes, and then at 0955 hours on Monday 06DEC2010, Death came quietly and kindly and Nana simply … slipped away.
We will be laying her next to Granda in the family plot on Saturday.
Again, I thank you, and my family thanks you, for your kind words and thoughts.
LawDog
Nana
She was born a doctors daughter in small town Texas, at a time when vehicular horse-power meant you had a horse attached to the front of your vehicle.
She was a school teacher, a librarian, and she sponsored the school newspaper, touching literally thousands of students lives — and outlived many of her students.
She is preceded by her husband, her son-in-law and all of her brothers and sisters; and she is survived by her daughter, two grandsons and a granddaughter.
Rest in peace, Gran. I love you.
LawDog
Over on the left you will find a link to The Cornered Cat, a web-site by, about, and for the lady shooter written by an absolutely wonderful lady named Kathy Jackson whom I was on Staff with over at The High Road.
Kathy has now come out with a new book — again, for the distaff side of the shooting world — named “The Cornered Cat – A Woman’s Guide To Concealed Carry“.
Gentle Readers, if you are a lady shooter or a lady thinking of becoming a shooter, I highly recommend this book.
If you are of knuckledragging side of the species, might I suggest that it would not be amiss to consider getting a copy (or copies) of this book for those of the Fair Sex amongst your kith and kin?
Christmas is, after all, just around the corner.
LawDog
Anyone with internet access has no doubt heard of the latest act in Transportation Security Theatre.
A quick recap for those who have not: a gentleman who happened to have a digital recording device “opted out” of walking through the full-body scan (also referred to as the Porn-Scan, the Pervo-Scan, and the alliteratively correct RapeScan), and was informed that he would be the recipient of the new “comprehensive pat down”.
Having not received the time-honoured dinner and movie, nor even a kiss, the gentleman in question announced that if his wedding tackle got groped, he would have the groper arrested.
The local TSA operatives got their noses out of joint, with the end result that said dissenter got escorted from the aeroport with dire threats of an investigation and an $11,000 fine in his near future.
This has happily rebounded throughout BlogWorld with the result that a TSA spokes-critter has been caught on record making a very stupid statement:
“The (body image scanning) technology is sent to the airports without the ability to save, transmit or print the images,” said Greg Soule, TSA spokesman, in an interview with CBSNews.com. “At airports, the images are examined by a security officer in a remote location, and, once the image is cleared, they’re deleted.”
Oh, dumb. Dumb, dumb, dumb.
TSA employees are people. And people — like it or not — will find some way to Rule 34 the scanner images. Trust me, I deal with people every day.
It’s going to happen.
So, I predict that in about a year — two years at the outside — a different TSA spokes-critter will be on national TeeVee explaining that the assorted scanned images of females’ dishabille (Herself gleefully comes up with “PILFs!”, I leave the translation of that to others better versed with Seinfeld than myself, but apparently the first word is “Passengers”) is an isolated incident, that it can’t happen again and steps have been taken to fire the TSA employee responsible.
Huh.
In light of this, if I were the father of teenage girls, there is no way this side of Hel that I’d take them anywhere near an aeroport with this kind of set-up … ever again.
In what rational world does it become okay for someone to tell you, “Hey, we’re going to take nekkid pictures of your precious daughters — but it’s okay! It’s done by an anonymous person, and it’s for your safety! And we won’t ever, ever keep those pictures! We promise!” …
… And people are fine with this. More than that, people are being told this is a Good Thing.
It’s a Good Thing for a stranger to take nude pictures of your little girl. More than that, It’s For Your Safety! The Government Says So!
*blink, blink*
Is it just me, or is there something fundamentally wrong with that whole mind-set?
Those wishing to make some kind of statement to the aerolines, may check out these links:
Opt Out Day
Personally, unless some government entity is paying my way on government business, I’m going to do my level best not to ever go through an aeroport with this level of idiocy installed.
And I plan to send a hand-written letter to the major aerolines and the local aeroports stating just this, also.
LawDog
By way of Herself, I find my self watching the BBC Masterpiece Mystery series, Sherlock.
It is a retelling of Sir Arthur’s classic detective, my very own favourite Sherlock Holmes, albeit from a very modern perspective.
Some folks are not going to like this Holmes, but just like the recent movie involving Robert Downey (jr) and Jude Law, I approve of this Sherlock Holmes. He is much more faithful — not completely so, but more so than other efforts — and this pleases me.
The stories are set in the modern era of computers, cell phones and such (nicotine patches!) with Dr Watson being a veteran of the recent on-going unpleasantness in Afghanistan and Iraq.
There are several tongue-in-cheek references to the original stories — the first episode is titled, “A Study in Pink”, and others abound.
The first three episodes are free for a short time on the above-linked web-page, with the last one ending in what is — for me — an absolutely infuriatingly nail-biting cliff-hanger.
It doesn’t cost you anything to watch the first three, and I think anyone who loves the old stories would be well-served by giving up a bit of time to watching these.
One word of advice to Dr Watson, though: If some critter has outfitted you with a Semtex weskit, and has the monumentally poor judgment to not only get within arm’s reach of you, but to allow you to get an arm around his throat … do go ahead, apply a rear naked choke, and just put him out of everyones misery.
Honestly.
Go forth, watch, enjoy!
LawDog
“Right is right even if no one is doing it; wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it.”
— St Augustine of Hippo
LawDog